Posted by
arclightzero on Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:34:31 AM
Cross posted from A [sometimes] Logical View of the Illogical

Much to my dismay, Madison has succeeded in passing a non-binding
voluntary ban on trans fats. Although I commend them for making it
voluntary, I severely condemn them for getting involved period. Just
like global warming, second hand smoke and all of the other liberal
panic de jour topics that we have been getting hit with over the past
months, I question the legitimacy of the science and I question the
legitimacy of government involvement.Being a man of science and logic,
I try to ensure that my head rules over my heart. In turn, I avoid
allowing the panic topics to get to me and instead choose to go out and
do my own research before deciding to jump on a bandwagon. The
difference then, between the others and me, is that I don’t
believe in allowing the government or special interest groups rule my
decision making process. I would rather know the facts and then be able
to decide on my own whether or not I want to do something or not. it’s
called freedom of choice.
Anyway, getting back to trans fats. I have done my research and have
read arguments on both sides of the table. On one hand, I agree with
the fact the trans fats probably aren’t very good for you - but then
again, there are many things out there that aren’t good for you. Trans
fats are just the current topic in the cross hairs. Then again I’ve
been down this road before. I’m old enough to remember when eggs were
under this same cross hair, and we all know what happened with that one.
See, this is the problem with going on a crusade with questionable
science as your only backing. You may be right, but then again, you may
be wrong (as was the case with eggs). In the case of trans fats, some
of the ill health effects are fairly well proven. Other claims are very
much based on speculation (yet the anti-trans fats crowd touts them as
facts in stone).
So, health effects aside, why have trans fats suddenly come under
fire? See, this is why my red flag goes up when topics such as this
come up. After all, if trans fats are as bad as they’re made out to be,
why has it taken over 100 years before reaching this level of panic? In
fact, trans fats were introduced in 1902 and have been used extensively
since then, yet only now are people concerned about the health effects?
I can’t help but to call bull on this one.
As far as I can see, this is the saturated fats craze for the
2000’s. Remember the original craze from the 1980’s? According to the
massive public campaign, there was nothing worse for you than saturated
fat. Eat saturated fats and you’ll probably die. This was due in part
to CSPI (Center for Science and Public Interest). At the same time,
CSPI exonerated trans fats and specifically claimed that “All told the charges against trans fats just don’t add up. And by extension, hydrogenated oils seem relatively innocent.” In fact, CSPI nutrition director Bonnie Liebman said: “The bottom line. Trans shmans!”
So, in response, congress passed a food labeling act and required
food manufacturers to disclose saturated fat content. Interestingly,
due to pressure from CSPI and other special interest groups,
restaurants changed from using oils containing high levels of saturated
fat t0… partially hydrogenated oils.
Interestingly, six years after slamming saturated fat and exonerated
trans fats, CSPI demanded that trans fat content on food labels, and
cycle of pressure to change begins again.
So, I can’t help but to ask: Is this science or panic? After all,
there are some curious facts out there that need to be addressed, and
most of these special interest health groups aren’t answering them.
For instance, typical trans fat intake has remained the same since
the 1960’s, yet life expectancy has continued to go up. Also, low fat
diets lower HDL levels in the body much more so than diets high in
trans fats. Approximately 25% of trans fats consumed come from natural
sources (i.e. red meat)… Of total fat intake, trans fats make up only
about 3%, whereas saturated fats still make up 14% of the average diet.
Also, the National Cholesterol Education Program of the National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute says:
“What’s Public Enemy No. 1 with respect to cholesterol raising? From a dietary standpoint, it’s saturated fat.”
Yet, here we are, going after trans fats as if somebody were putting
arsenic in our food. But why? Has the use of trans fats really been
killing off Americans any more than other products? Has it’s use
lowered our life expectancy? No, of course not. Since 1902, our overall
health and life expectancy has certainly gone up - significantly at
that. In fact, according to WebMD,
between 1970 and 2002, deaths related to heart disease dropped 52%.
Need more proof? How many people in the military are dropping over from
heart disease? Want to know a secret? The military has made pretty good
use of trans fats over the years due to it’s stability and shelf life.
Hell, that’s one of the reasons that boat food was so damned good. A
little chow cooked up in some Crisco. MMMMM, good!

So, with all that said, here is my official stance:
Moderation. Trans fats should be considered within your total diet
and lifestyle. Yes, trans fats are bad for you - however really not
much worse than saturated fats - and should be limited. However, trans
fats do not cause heart disease. Trans fats
may contribute to heart disease, but so do saturated fats, salt, and a
whole host of other food items. So here’s the bottom line… Trans fats
in moderation and a healthy lifestyle will not kill, however trans fats
in higher levels and a less than healthy lifestyle probably isn’t good
for your health and heart.
As for Madison, well, as I have said before. I don’t believe in any
sort of government involvement. I don’t believe in regulation - however
non-binding it may be - over people’s right to choose. Jumping on the
panic bandwagon does nothing to teach people responsibility for
themselves. It breeds dependence on the government to tell them what
they should or shouldn’t do, which is not a good way to be. I’m sorely
disappointed in this decision, and will work against any attempt to
make this a statewide issue (which is the next move by Madison and
Informed Consumers Equal Improved Health).
Keep your hands out of our freedoms.
Check out the Trans Fats FAQ